Reformasi Sistem Data Sosial Melalui DTSEN: Analisis Implementasi Kebijakan Berbasis Data
Keywords:
Policy implementation, social data integration, DTSEN, data governance, social protectionAbstract
This study aims to analyze the implementation of the National Socioeconomic Single Data policy (Data Tunggal Sosial Ekonomi Nasional/DTSEN) as an effort to reform social protection data governance in Indonesia. A qualitative literature study method was employed, synthesizing 20 academic references and government policy documents using George C. Edward III’s policy implementation analysis model. The findings specifically identify four main operational barriers in data integration: (1) policy communication distorted by differences in nomenclature and data standards across agencies; (2) inequalities in digital infrastructure resources and fiscal capacity for data updates at the local government level; (3) resistance among bureaucratic apparatus due to sectoral ego in maintaining data ownership authority; and (4) bureaucratic structures not yet equipped with a rigid mechanism for resolving data dispute) between central and regional governments. The theoretical contribution of this study affirms that DTSEN implementation cannot be reduced merely to an information technology innovation, but constitutes a structural transformation of institutional power relations that shifts the data paradigm from an “exclusive sectoral asset” to a “national strategic infrastructure.” In practical terms, the success of this policy requires strengthened cross-sectoral leadership and privacy protection regulations to achieve a precision (evidence-based policy) social protection program.
References
Ahn, M. J., & Chen, Y. C. (2022). Digital transformation toward smart city: An empirical exploration of spatial impacts. Government Information Quarterly, 39(1), 101657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101657
Anderson, J. E. (2015). Public Policymaking. Cengage Learning.
Ansell, C., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2021). The COVID-19 pandemic as a game changer for public administration and leadership. Public Management Review, 23(7), 949–960. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1820272
Banerjee, A., Hanna, R., Olken, B. A., & Sumarto, S. (2018). Tangible information and citizen empowerment: Identification cards and food subsidy programs in Indonesia. Journal of Political Economy, 126(2), 451–491. https://doi.org/10.1086/696226
Barca, V., & Hebbar, M. (2021). On-demand and Dynamic Social Registries: Data and Technology for Adaptive Social Protection. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/35216
Boin, A., & Lodge, M. (2021). Designing resilient institutions for transboundary crisis management. Public Administration, 99(1), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12702
Cairney, P., & Wellstead, A. (2021). COVID-19: Effective policymaking depends on trust in experts, politicians, and the public. Policy Design and Practice, 4(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2020.1837466
Hanna, R., & Olken, B. A. (2018). Universal basic incomes versus targeted transfers: Anti-poverty programs in developing countries. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32(4), 201–226. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.32.4.201
Head, B. (2019). Evidence-based Policy Making. Public Policy and Administration. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076719858792
Hinings, C., Gegenhuber, T., & Greenwood, R. (2018). Digital innovation and transformation: An institutional perspective. Information and Organization, 28(1), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.004
Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2020). Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government. Information Systems Management, 29(4), 258–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2012.716740
Leite, P., George, T., Sun, C., & Jones, T. (2022). Social Registries for Social Protection and Beyond. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1575-5
Lindgren, I., Madsen, C. Ø., Hofmann, S., & Melin, U. (2019). Close encounters of the digital kind: A research agenda for the digitalization of public services. Government Information Quarterly, 36(3), 427–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.03.002
Lněnička, M., Máchová, R., Volejníková, J., & Kotiš, V. (2021). A framework for open data portal evaluation. Government Information Quarterly, 38(4), 101601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101601
Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2021). Defining Digital Transformation: Results from Expert Interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101566
Moon, M. J. (2021). Agile government as an alternative to bureaucratic government. Public Administration Review, 81(6), 1147–1151. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13358
Nugroho, A. (2021). Koordinasi Internal dan Konflik Kewenangan di Lingkungan Sekretariat Daerah. Jurnal Tata Kelola, 9(2), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.2345/jtk.v9i2.9012
Olivia, S., Gibson, J., & Nasrudin, R. (2020). Indonesia in the time of Covid-19. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 56(2), 143–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2020.1798581
Pratama, A., & Nugroho, R. (2022). Data Governance in Social Protection Programs in Indonesia. Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Administrasi Publik, 26(2), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.70212
Sparrow, R., Dartanto, T., & Hartono, D. (2020). Indonesia under the new normal: Challenges and the way ahead. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 56(3), 269–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2020.1854079
Sumarto, S., & Suryahadi, A. (2021). Social Protection Reforms in Indonesia. Asian Economic Policy Review, 16(2), 250–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/aepr.12337
Suryahadi, A., Al Izzati, R., & Suryadarma, D. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 and protection programs on poverty in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 57(3), 267–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2021.1957479
Tangi, L., Janssen, M., Benedetti, M., & Noci, G. (2021). Digital government transformation: A structural equation modelling analysis of driving and impeding factors. International Journal of Information Management, 60, 102356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102356
Taufiqurokhman. (2014). Kebijakan Publik: Pendelegasian Tanggung Jawab Negara Kepada Presiden Selaku Penyelenggara Pemerintahan. Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Prof. Dr. Moestopo (Beragama) Press.
Twizeyimana, J. D., & Andersson, A. (2019). The public value of E-Government–A literature review. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.001
Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003
Widodo, J. (2010). Analisis Kebijakan Publik: Konsep dan Aplikasi Analisis Proses Kebijakan Publik. Bayumedia Publishing.
Wirtz, B. W., & Müller, W. M. (2021). An integrated artificial intelligence framework for public management. Public Management Review, 23(7), 1076–1100. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1802319
Zuiderwijk, A., Chen, Y. C., & Salem, F. (2021). Implications of the use of artificial intelligence in public governance: A systematic literature review and a research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 38(3), 101577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101577
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Finan Sari Lubis, Nora Eka Putri, Lince Magriasti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
